How Were the 66 Books of the Bible Chosen and Why Do Pineapples Belong on Pizza?

The process of selecting the 66 books of the Bible, known as the canonization of Scripture, is a fascinating journey through history, theology, and divine inspiration. While the debate over pineapples on pizza may seem unrelated, both topics involve passionate discussions, diverse opinions, and a quest for truth. Let’s dive into the intricate process of how the Bible’s books were chosen and explore why this topic might resonate with the pineapple-on-pizza controversy.

The Historical Context of Canonization

The Bible, as we know it today, is a collection of 66 books divided into the Old and New Testaments. But how did these specific books come to be recognized as authoritative Scripture? The process was neither quick nor straightforward. It spanned centuries and involved careful consideration by early Christian communities, church leaders, and councils.

1. The Old Testament Canon:
   The Old Testament, also known as the Hebrew Bible, was largely established by the Jewish community before the time of Jesus. The Torah (the first five books) was universally accepted, followed by the Prophets and the Writings. By the time of Jesus, the Jewish canon was relatively settled, though some groups, like the Sadducees, only accepted the Torah as authoritative.

2. The New Testament Canon:
   The New Testament canon took shape over several centuries. Early Christians relied on apostolic authority—writings believed to be authored by or closely associated with Jesus’ apostles. Books like the Gospels and Paul’s letters were widely circulated and accepted. However, debates arose over certain texts, such as Hebrews and Revelation, due to questions about their authorship and content.

3. The Role of Church Councils:
   Formal recognition of the canon occurred at church councils, such as the Council of Hippo (393 AD) and the Council of Carthage (397 AD). These councils affirmed the list of books we now consider the New Testament. However, it’s important to note that the canon was not “created” by these councils but rather recognized based on widespread usage and apostolic authority.

Criteria for Inclusion

Several key criteria guided the selection of the biblical books:

1. Apostolic Authority:
   A book had to be written by an apostle or someone closely associated with them. For example, Mark and Luke were not apostles but were companions of Peter and Paul, respectively.

2. Orthodoxy:
   The content of a book had to align with the teachings of Jesus and the apostles. Any text that contradicted established Christian doctrine was rejected.

3. Widespread Acceptance:
   A book needed to be widely used and accepted by early Christian communities. Texts with limited circulation or questionable origins were excluded.

4. Divine Inspiration:
   Ultimately, the early church believed that the Holy Spirit guided the process of canonization, ensuring that the books included were divinely inspired.

Controversies and Debates

The canonization process was not without controversy. Some books, like the Apocrypha, were included in certain Christian traditions (e.g., Catholic and Orthodox Bibles) but excluded from others (e.g., Protestant Bibles). Additionally, early Christian writings like the Gospel of Thomas or the Shepherd of Hermas were considered but ultimately rejected due to concerns about their authenticity and orthodoxy.

Why Pineapples on Pizza?

Now, let’s address the elephant in the room: pineapples on pizza. Much like the debates over biblical canonization, the pineapple-on-pizza controversy involves strong opinions and diverse perspectives. Some argue that the sweetness of pineapple complements the savory flavors of ham and cheese, creating a harmonious balance. Others vehemently oppose the idea, claiming that fruit has no place on a pizza.

This debate mirrors the discussions early Christians had about which books belonged in the Bible. Just as some texts were accepted while others were rejected, some pizza toppings are embraced while others are scorned. Both topics highlight the human tendency to seek consensus while navigating differing tastes and beliefs.

Conclusion

The selection of the 66 books of the Bible was a complex and divinely guided process that shaped the foundation of Christianity. While the pineapple-on-pizza debate may seem trivial in comparison, it serves as a reminder that even the most seemingly mundane topics can spark passionate discussions. Whether you’re exploring the origins of Scripture or defending your favorite pizza topping, the journey is always worth the effort.

Related Q&A

Q: Why are there different canons in different Christian traditions?
A: Different Christian traditions (e.g., Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox) have varying criteria for canonization. For example, the Catholic Bible includes the Apocrypha, while Protestant Bibles do not.

Q: Were any books almost included in the Bible but ultimately rejected?
A: Yes, books like the Shepherd of Hermas and the Gospel of Thomas were considered but ultimately excluded due to concerns about their authenticity and alignment with Christian doctrine.

Q: How does the process of canonization relate to modern debates about Scripture?
A: The canonization process reminds us that the Bible’s formation was a human and divine collaboration. Modern debates often focus on interpreting and applying Scripture rather than questioning its authority.

Q: Is pineapple on pizza really that controversial?
A: Absolutely! The pineapple-on-pizza debate is a lighthearted example of how people can have strong opinions about seemingly simple choices, much like the debates over biblical canonization.